Differences Between Morgenthau And Kant - 1311 Words

A school of thought, as defined by the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is a point of view held by a particular group. Schools of thought relating to world politics are theories that have been the center and cause of countless debates. Two of the most well-known and influential schools of thought in the realm of international politics are realism and liberalism. While the ideas making up both systems have been around for centuries, each school has been since furthered and analyzed by international relations experts and philosophers. Two notable figures of realism and liberalism are Hans Morgenthau and Immanuel Kant, respectively, who formed basic principles that became the center of each school of thought. There are several key differences between Morgenthau and Kant. Some of these lie in their opposing views on international systems, states as actors in international affairs, and ethical issues. Others revolve around government systems and the concept of human nature. Hans Morgenthau, a philosopher of realist thought, believed individual states to be the most important actors on the international stage. He argues that states are self-interested forces constantly vying with other states for dominance; that they’re vying with them for power. Power refers to â€Å"anything that establishes and maintains the control of man over man.† States are consistently consumed with the process of maintaining the power they already have and acquiring more. In Politics Among Nations, MorgenthauShow MoreRelatedJohn Locke : A Work Of Political Ingenuity872 Words   |  4 Pagespower between state and its people without common superior intervening revert a society to state of nature. BETWEEN KANT AND LOCKE: SIMILARITIES AND THE INCONGRUITY IN THEIR THOUGHT This part focuses on the contrasting views and similarities between the works of Locke and Kant on civil society. The latter’s approach towards the some ideas were more abstract and somewhat controversial than the views of Locke. Some writers argue that the reason for the inconsistency in philosophical work of Kant isRead MoreThe Between Domestic And International Affairs1504 Words   |  7 Pagesgovernments are losing their control. New global politics are arising where there is no difference between domestic and international affairs. Non-governmental organizations have helped with global connectedness by connecting people throughout the world. International organizations like the International Money Fund have shown the growth of worldwide rules and regulations. The world has come to have interdependence between nation-states, where an event that happens somewhere else could still have a greatRead MoreIslamic Terrorism And Islamic Extremist Violence1782 Words   |  8 PagesTheo Van Gogh, a controversial film director and columnist (BBC src. C 2004). While both France and The Netherlands have witnessed cases of Islamic extremist violence and display similar government structures, some key political and social differences exist between each country in relation to Islamic integration and acceptance. A comparison of the countries illuminates the necessity of cultural assimilation and the significant benefits of an active government partially exemplified in the Netherland’sRead MoreThe And International Political And Legal Sphere Essay2238 Words   |  9 Pagesproblems of the current international political and legal sphere are examined and deciphered to fix all of the â€Å"problems† that, according to Delsol, plague society. I n Unjust Justice, she brings a realist approach to international law similar to Hans Morgenthau, arguing that the state of anarchy with is fueled through plurality is more favorable to an international state of monopolized ideals. Grappling with the idealism and realism, Chantal Delsol adopts the ideas of many political theorists to paintRead MoreIsrael Palestine Conflict, an International Relations Research Paper8755 Words   |  36 Pagesgoing back atleast 5000 years in time, the paper only throws light on the conflict, post 19th century. And this too, only a cursory overview of a timeline, rather than a detailed description. The paper also attempts to find the bones of contention between the two peoples, clearly laying out the issues and problems along with the need to resolve them. Finally, the paper analyses the two mainstream solutions suggested for resolution of this conflict, being the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Two-Stateà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ theory and the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‹Å"Bi-NationalRead MoreIsrael Palestine Conflict, an International Relations Research Paper8749 Words   |  35 Pagesgoing back atleast 5000 years in time, the paper only throws light on the conflict, post 19th century. And this too, only a cursory overview of a timeline, rather than a detailed description. The paper also attempts to find the bones of contention between the two peoples, clearly laying out the issues and problems along with the need to resolve them. Finally, the paper analyses the two mainstream solutions suggested for resolution of this conflict, being the ‘Two-State’ theory and the ‘Bi-NationalRead MoreThe Evil of Politics and the Ethics of Evil10364 Words   |  42 PagesThe Evil of Politics and the Ethics of Evil Author(s): Hans J. Morgenthau Source: Ethics, Vol. 56, No. 1 (Oct., 1945), pp. 1-18 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2988705 Accessed: 21/09/2010 06:43 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTORs Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTORs Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior